I was thinking about my dwrConfig suggestion a bit more... I'm not so sure it's a good idea now.
First, it forces multiple (at least two) network requests instead of just one... one to download the base DWR Javascript, then at least one more to get the concatenated interface & utils scripts... maybe more if each interface is loaded separately.
Second, it means DWR has to introduce some sort of script loader mechanism. Now, it may not be too complex a thing, depends on how you approach it, but it's certainly more than is there now.
Third, it increases the odds of a page stalling while for resources (more than there would be if we had a single script file to retrieve I mean),. for the reasons stated in the first point.
So, after further thought, I don't really see my own suggestion as being a good one after all
While I still think the query string approach might lead to some really long URLs, and has those same cache issues that you spoke about on the mailing list potentially (there seemed to be some differing opinions on that), I'd say it's probably preferable to the dwrConfig idea.
(at least, that's my thinking today... ask me again tomorrow! LOL)
I was thinking about my dwrConfig suggestion a bit more... I'm not so sure it's a good idea now.
First, it forces multiple (at least two) network requests instead of just one... one to download the base DWR Javascript, then at least one more to get the concatenated interface & utils scripts... maybe more if each interface is loaded separately.
Second, it means DWR has to introduce some sort of script loader mechanism. Now, it may not be too complex a thing, depends on how you approach it, but it's certainly more than is there now.
Third, it increases the odds of a page stalling while for resources (more than there would be if we had a single script file to retrieve I mean),. for the reasons stated in the first point.
So, after further thought, I don't really see my own suggestion as being a good one after all
While I still think the query string approach might lead to some really long URLs, and has those same cache issues that you spoke about on the mailing list potentially (there seemed to be some differing opinions on that), I'd say it's probably preferable to the dwrConfig idea.
(at least, that's my thinking today... ask me again tomorrow! LOL)